On Wednesday I was bored.
Surprise surprise surprise........I had both the time and desire to ride and so something bad happens.
I drove to the stable, without my cell phone and a dog that was VERY excited to go along on a trail ride to go on a pony ride.
And....and greeted by a Farley whose left eye looked much worse than the day before.
So of course I had to BACK home to get my phone and call the vet, try to explain to the dog why we WEREN'T going on a ride, and change out of my riding tights.
In addition to even more tear production, Farley also was squinting, blinking, and standing so that her left side was away from me. Even though I couldn't see any foreign bodies in the eye or any obvious signs of trauma just the change from Tuesday to Wednesday was enough to make me pick up the phone and call my vet.
Eye stuff is NOT something you want to wait on or mess around with. I'm not a fan of going to vet for every bump and scrape - especially if the injury isn't sustained during an athletic effort. But a worsening eye over a 24 hour period is a major red flag.
As I made the vet appointment I did wonder whether I was overreacting - At that point I hadn't tried to take pictures and was in a rush to get home and call the vet before they closed for the day and so in my memory, standing in the kitchen Farley didn't seem THAT bad - the only thing really noticeable was the increased tears and increased heat.
When I went back out to the stable to feed, I tried to take some pictures and THAT'S when I realized that Farley was indeed showing more clinical signs than I had realized.
The normal side? No problems snapping a picture of the eye while it was open. The inflammed side kept closing and squinting every time I brought the camera out and clicked the shutter. And I had trouble getting her to face me evenly with both eyes - something I didn't notice before trying to take pictures.
I wouldn't have thought that taking a picture could make something show up SO MUCH BETTER - most of the time I feel like everything looks so much worse in real life than it does on a photo.
I'm not going to expound on why delaying treatment of an eye is bad - that's information you can get on any google search. However, I AM going to get on my soap box and tell you why you should self treat eyes that look like this with CAUTION.
My top two differentials for Farley were:
1. Corneal ulcer - uncomplicated, probably not full thickness since I couldn't visualize anything grossly (but you never know....)
2. Inflammation without an ulcer (Uveitis).
Either one was a possibility.
A corneal ulcer is basically a scratch on the eyeball globe. The more minor (not full thickness) uncomplicated ones that get treatment heal in about a week and it's all about preventing secondary infection and keeping that nice uncomplicated ulcer from getting complicated.
Think of uveitis as a fancy name for "inflammed eyeball" (and yes, I know that uveitis specifically refers to inflammation of the uvea.....but I'm not teaching an ophtho class, I'm trying to explain a certain point....). Uveitis (specifically anterior uveuitis) can occur secondary to something like an ulcer or something else that is pissing off the eyeball.....or in horses, because horses are the definition are THE most fragile animals in the universe......they can get this condition called Equine Recurrent Uveitis (ERU). The most popular theory is that ERU is an autoimmune disease. ERU is a major cause of blindness in horses.
So, I either have an inflammed eyeball because she tried to skewer it on something OR I have an inflammed eyeball because her body has decided it no longer likes her eyeball.
In both conditions we have inflammation.
In one condition we have a traumatic injury (could be very very tiny) that will heal nicely as long as a secondary infection doesn't occur - which requires a nice strong immune system to fight off any nasty intruders.
In the other condition we have a potentially overactive immune system that might need to be toned down a bit.
Are you starting to see why the treatment for each condition, although they may look almost identical, are going to be treated completely differently?
Corticosteroids are IMMUNE SUPPRESSORS. They are ABSOLUTELY CONTRAINDICATED when a corneal ulcer is present. They are really helpful when you are trying to calm down an over active immune response that is causing uveitis.
My Dear Reader should know by now that I'm actually in favor of having horse people have access to drugs to treat their own horses, and with a few simple rules and some education, I think most of us can use bute, banamine, surpass etc quite effectively and without harm to our horses (I also don't think preventative products like flea and tick control and heartworm meds etc should be prescription but that's a topic for another post - the point is, I think that pet owners - and especially large animal owners - are fairly responsible people who can use medications properly if given some guidelines).
HOWEVER, I do NOT feel that corticosteroids fall into the category of medications I would be comfortable with a layperson administrating without some direction of a medical professional.
So far in my limited experience, corticosteroids seem to be administered incorrectly more often than not - for example: to an animal that is attempting to fight off an infection (or will be fighting an infection because of a wound). Why would you want to suppress the immune system in this circumstance? The anti-inflammatory properties of corticosteroids are powerful and absolutely indicated in some circumstances, but if you aren't sure whether exactly what is going on, corticosteroids probably aren't the answer.
Unless you are in the habit of administering corticosteroids systemically to your horse that you think isn't doing quite right (and I don't think that describes most of us), treating EYES is the most likely situation I can think of that the average horse owner might give a corticosteroid when you shouldn't have.
In addition to the eye looking very similar for both conditions, the eye medications themselves look really similar! The triple antibiotic that does NOT contain a corticosteroid that your vet may have prescribed when your horse was seen for a corneal ulcer looks almost identical to the triple antibiotic that DOES contain a corticosteroid, that was probably prescribed when your horse had uveitis but no ulcer.
In class we were told to be very very careful because even vets make this mistake. It's easy to hand the wrong med to the client out of the pharmacy because all the boxes and the products look really similar.
In the end, Farley was diagnosed with uveitis WITHOUT an ulcer and I was sent home with an ointment that contains a corticosteroid.
Now that Farley has a history of a uveitis episode without an ulcer, I will be more comfortable treating a future apparent inflammed eye without a vet visit, as long as I'm REALLY confident that I don't see an ulcer (and knowing that if I missed a really tiny ulcer, I just made it worse by using that ointment - and deciding whether it's worth taking that risk).
In summary:
- KNOW what medication you have from the last time. Does it have a corticosteroid?
- REALIZE there are 2 conditions that are very common that can be hard to differentiate that need completely different medications.
- CONSIDER the risk that you are taking if you decide to self diagnose and medicate. It may or may not be worth the risk. It may or may not be the same thing that you had *last* time.
- There are a lot of things we do as horse owners that might help - and at the very least probably don't make it worse. Ophthalmic stuff doesn't fall into that category.....you can really screw it up by giving the wrong thing.
Posts
Thanks for the tips, Mel. I've been lucky enough to have never had a horse with an eye issue (cross fingers, knock on wood, through salt over my shoulder), but now I'm a little better informed if it does happen and I can ask good questions.
ReplyDeleteTHIS! What an AWESOME post on the importance of paying attention to eye issues and the medications we put into them. This is a huge pet peeve of mine at work. I wish some general practitioners were as conscious as you are about this kind of issue. I can't tell you how many old-school vets we see who prescribe a steroid for an eye problem that ends up turning into a melting corneal ulcer because of the steroid. LOVE that you posted photos of the medications themselves so others can see how easy it is to get them confused! At work each eye medication has its own little bin that is clearly labeled, so you are forced to double-check what drug you're grabbing. It's always good to make sure that the medication the doctor is giving you matches what the doctor said they were going to give you: doctors and techs sometimes do make mistakes, even when we double and triple check ourselves.
ReplyDeleteThanks Nicole :-) comments like yours make me think I'll be a passable vet in eighteen months. Also, for anyone interested in what can happen if you treat a ulcer with a corticosteroid, google "horse melting corneal ulcer". :-)
ReplyDeleteGreat post, Mel. In my long career with horses I've had the eye issue many times, and I always have the vet look at the eye, for the exact reasons you stated. 90% of the time the horse has merely banged his eye on something and there is no ulcer or scratch. However, I always want to be sure. My vet has told me that its always OK to use the eye ointment that is just antibiotic (no steroid). If the eye does not get better pronto, call the vet. But one should not use the ointment with the steroid component unless one can competently check for ulcers, scratches etc.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the great post! We have dealt with eye injuries a few times, and if the vet can't see anything she routinely "dyes" the eye to check for uptake. Is this something that is still done? Can a layman get hands on dye to do a self check? Really loved learning the differences in the ointments! Thanks again :)
ReplyDeleteYep, there's a dye that depending on the thickness of the ulcer, will dye. think of the cornea like a sandwich - there's a thin hydrophobic layer on the front and back, and a hydrophillic layer in the middle. The hydrophilic layer absorbs the dye, while the hydrophobic layers do not. So, if there isn't a ulcer, no dye is absorbed. or if the ucler is really deep, the edges of the ulcer will take up the dye and the middle won't because you've gotten all the way down to the bottom layer (and are really close to rupturing the eye). You have what looks like a "donut".
ReplyDeleteI think you can get the dye strips without a perscription. this is what I was told by my vet - most ulcers you will be able to see with your naked eye. The pin point ones you will probably have to dye to see. the problem is the pinpoint ones, not only will you have to dye to see them, you will also need a focal bright light source +/- a special light and a magnification hood thing. The other issue is that if the horse has an ulcer, it's likely to be painful, the the probbility that the horse is going to let you mess with the eye, and hold the lids open in order to shine a bright light in it so that you can say with confidence whether there is an ulcer or not is not real likely. It's my understanding that the dye is pretty harmless, so it might be a nice option for you if you have a willing horse, but because of the squinting, blinking, lighting issues etc, you might not be able to see what you need to see. Hope this makes sense!